Students are required to a 2-3 page write summary and critiques for one of the reading assignments prior to each class meeting. These assignments are designed to orient students to the topics presented and to encourage students to think critically about the material that will be presented in class. Students will receive points if they directly address the assignments and pose a critical aspect of the reading assignment (i.e., antithetical to what is stated in the assigned readings or covered in class). Questions may be posted for specific readings to give students an idea of topics to address. RAs ARE DUE BY FRIDAY AT 11:59 pm EACH WEEK; no late assignments will be accepted.

Reading Assessment Questions McGee & Crowley-Koch (2022), Chapter 5

1. In what ways are both OBM and HPT rooted in Behavior Analysis?
2. Explain why it isn't accurate to describe BSA as though it were an intervention.
3. Describe, in your own words, the three levels of the multi-level BSA approach.
4. Describe how the multi-leveled approach is distinct from PM.
5. Distinguish between vertical and horizontal alignment.

Reference:

Houmanfar, R. A., Fryling, M., & Alavosius, M. P. (2021). Applied Behavior Science in Organizations: Consilience of Historical and Emerging Trends in Organizational Behavior Management. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003198949

Rubric

OBM Reading Assignment Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Summary of Key Concepts

5 pts Full Marks Provides a thorough, accurate summary of the key concepts from the reading, demonstrating a deep understanding of the material.

2.5 pts Half Marks Covers some key concepts but with significant omissions or misunderstandings.

0 pts No Marks No summary provided or the summary is wholly inaccurate.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

7 pts Full Marks Offers a sophisticated critique, effectively identifying and discussing multiple critical aspects, including points antithetical to the reading.

3.5 pts Half Marks Includes a critique with some depth, but may miss some critical aspects or the antithetical point is weakly argued.

0 pts No Marks No critique provided or the critique is wholly irrelevant.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration with Class Topics

4 pts Full Marks Insightfully integrates the reading with topics covered in class, showing clear connections and relevance.

2 pts Half Marks Attempts to connect with class topics but the integration is unclear or weak.

0 pts No Marks No connection made to class topics.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity and Organization

2 pts Full Marks Writing is clear, well-organized, and easy to follow. Each section is logically structured and transitions smoothly.

1 pts Half Marks Writing is generally clear, but some areas may lack organization or coherence.

0 pts No Marks Writing is unclear and poorly organized, making it difficult to follow.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and APA Style

2 pts Full Marks No grammatical errors, and the paper follows APA style perfectly.

1 pts Half Marks A few minor grammatical errors and/or APA style issues.

0 pts No Marks Frequent grammatical errors and/or significant issues with APA style.

2 pts

Total Points: 20