Students will read and review and discuss the elements above that are shown in the Case(s) assigned (below) for this DQ Assignment: Only answer the questions at the end of the Case Scenario, and then discuss the case by mentioning in your answers to me and your peers how the facts, issues and more relate to the case. **** PLEASE DO NOT GIVE AN OUTLINE OF THE CASE WITH THE LISTED ELEMENTS... JUST INCORPORATE IN YOUR WRITING AFTER ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS AT THE END OF THE CASE SCENARIO*****

1) Case 3-1 Hertz Corporation v. Friend

United States Supreme Court

130 S. Ct. 1181 (2010)

NEXT CASE:

2) Timothy Tyrone Foster, Petitioner v. Bruce

CHATMAN, WARDEN

United States Supreme Court AN

P136 S. Ct. 1737 (2016)

ANSWER THE CRITICAL THINKING AND ETHICAL DECISION MAKING QUESTIONS FOR EACH CASE - Elaborate using content information from the textbook and the case at hand.

LAST:

SEE THE SECTION IN THE CHAPTER DISCUSSING: Alternative Dispute Resolution and Discuss: Why might a Business prefer ADR over Ligation?

(Please, just read the section affiliated with this Business Law Method).