Subject: Research Project

Requirement:Interpret the following table

Supporting Document:

table 4 table 5 table 6 table 2 table 3 Table 2 Measurement model results Constructs Loadings Cronbach's a Composite reliability 0868 Average Variance extracted 0.687 DI 0.775 0.98 0841 0.847 O. 0.765 LINST 0.762 0.838 01511 LLINT 0.763 0.X 0.509 DUI DI2 DIB LINSTI LINSTL2 LINSTE LINST14 LINSTIS LLINTI LLINT LLINTO LLINTA LLINTS OLMI OLM OLMS OLM4 OLMS PSED PSE PSE SESI SLSZ SUS) SLS4 SESS 0.771 0.756 0,702 0.738 0879 0.866 0.774 0.767 OM 0.772 0.758 0703 0842 OLM 0.811 0869 0.570 PSE 0.807 0.886 0.721 SLS 0.860 0.889 0.618 0.262 0.897 0.780 799 070 07 table 2 table 3 table 4 table 5 table 6 LLINT OLM PSE SLS Table 3 Summary statistics. DI LINST DI 0.829 LINST 0.448 0.715 LLINT 0.343 0.515 OLM 0.312 0.445 PSE 0.402 0.477 SLS 0.280 0.478 0.714 0.350 0.482 0.293 0.755 0.570 0.679 0.849 0.610 0.786 table 2 table 3 table 4 table 5 table 6 DIZ Table 4 Loadings and cross loadings. DI LINST LLINT DII 0.798 0.309 0.227 0.841 0.374 0.286 DI3 0.847 0.417 0.326 LINSTI 0.301 0.813 0.352 LINSTI2 0.400 0.765 0.354 LINSTI3 0.319 0.771 0.393 LINSTI4 0.318 0.771 0.395 LINSTIS 0.249 0.756 0.384 LLINTI 0.294 0.339 0.702 LLINT2 0.222 0.391 0.738 LLINT3 0.233 0.316 0.879 LLINT4 0.278 0.438 0.866 LLINTS 0.232 0.373 0.774 OLMI 0.297 0.343 0.361 OLM2 0.222 0.383 0.272 OLM3 0.256 0.381 0.221 OLM4 0.179 0.226 0.277 OLM5 0.220 0.336 0.176 PSE1 0.322 0.515 0.396 PSE2 0.303 0.378 0.454 PSE3 0.394 0.322 0.384 SLS1 0.256 0.426 0.170 SLS2 0.235 0.420 0.206 SLS3 0.211 0.419 0.278 SLS4 0.227 0.316 0.321 SLS5 0.157 0.372 0.318 OLM 0.214 0.257 0.295 0.271 0.368 0.371 0.346 0.181 0.205 0.283 0.197 0.181 0.328 0.767 0.802 0.772 0.758 0.703 0.570 0.506 0.592 0.689 0.599 0.613 0.591 0.513 PSE 0.288 0.311 0.388 0.287 0.375 0.342 0.390 0.313 0.265 0.336 0.284 0.281 0.484 0.597 0.533 0.499 0.435 0.397 0.842 0.843 0.862 0.502 0.482 0.546 0.501 0.440 SLS 0.238 0.241 0.221 0.342 0.429 0.431 0.305 0.107 0.155 0.179 0.231 0.159 0.292 0.568 0.645 0.554 0.572 0.556 0.583 0.454 0.511 0.897 0.780 0.799 0.769 0.807 table 2 table 3 3 table 4 table 5 table 6 LLINT OLM PSE SLS Table 5 Heterotrait-monotrait ratio DI LINST DI LINST 0.569 LLINT 0.450 0.694 OLM 0.387 0.544 PSE 0.498 0.608 SLS 0.335 0.572 0.420 0.589 0.386 0.803 0.820 0.738 table 2 2 table 3 3 table 4 table 5 table 6 Remarks Table-6 Standardized regression weights for the research model. Hypothesis Regression Effect type SRW Pvalue Path DI -> OLM Direct effect 0.007 0.929 H2 LINST -> OLM Direct effect 0.177 0.026 LLINT -> OLM Direct effect -0.024 0.751 H4 OLM -> SLS Direct effect 0.768 5.68434E-14 H5 PSE -> OLM Direct effect 0.581 5.68434E-14 H3 Not Supported Supported Not Supported Supported Supported Journal of Computer Assisted Learning_WILEYLs Online Learning Motivation Direct Instructions Lecture HS 25 16, 117, NR. 19 5/15 Instructor-Learner Interactions 2a 30 Online Learning Satisfaction Learner Leamer Interactions HA Internet Self-efficacy these hypotheses, the research framework has been developed (see Figure 1). ; Zhu et al., 2020). SDT IS Hing aspects that can facili hological well-being, and connected to educational explain the relevance of gue that learners' ability to d learning behaviour may tivated learners can influ ch indicate that DL, ILL. LLI satisfaction in online learn 10. Muhsin et al. 2019 -2020). Moreover, online et al., 2017). Lis influence on in the learning process SOLM (Kuo et al. 2014. tudent learning motivation ng & Tsai, 2008). Previous nce on learer motivation onally, learning motivation nang & Chang 2012). As tigating the mediating role dent variables and student fine the possible mediating relationship between DL. HI. HI. H2 H2 H3, H3 H4. H4 HS H6 HZ HB H9 DL has a positive relationship with OLS. DL has a positive relationship with OLM ILI has a positive relationship with OLS. U has a positive relationship with OLM. LLI has a positive relationship with OLS I has a positive relationship with OLM ISE has a positive relationshio with OLS. ISE has a positive relationship with OLM. : OLM has a positive relationship with OLS. OLM will mediate the relationship between DL and OLS. OLM wil medate the relationship between ILI and OLS OLM wil mediate the relationship between LU and OLS. OLM wil mediate the relationship between ISE and OLS, 4 RESEARCH METHOD 4.1 Participant characteristics