summarize and concise The probable result would be contingent upon the court's analysis of the parties' previous behavior and the presence of a legally binding contract or agreement to distribute lottery wins. Although Ms. Lilly may contend that there is an inferred contract due to the parties' previous actions and behavior, the court may demand compelling proof of both parties' consent and purpose to create a legally enforceable agreement. If the court determines that there is enough evidence of an implied contract or mutual agreement to split lottery prizes, it may decide in favor of Ms. Lilly and grant her a share of the winnings acquired by Ms. Phillips at the Christmas party. Nevertheless, if the court concludes that there was no explicit agreement or mutual understanding between the parties regarding the distribution of lottery prizes acquired outside of league play, it may decide in favor of Ms. Phillips and reject Ms. Lilly's assertion