Question: summarized below. Server 1 Server 2 Forst cost, 211,298 200 000 50,000 year 1. plus 5000 per year for years 2, 3, and 4 (gradient)
summarized below. Server 1 Server 2 Forst cost, 211,298 200 000 50,000 year 1. plus 5000 per year for years 2, 3, and 4 (gradient) Net cath flow, S/year 35,000 70,000 maximum for yeats 5 on, even if the server is replaced Life, years 3 or 4 3 Case Study Exercises Use spreadsheet analysis to determine the following: 1. If the MARR - 28%, which server should be selected? Use the PW or AW method to make the selection. For serverse 3 and 4 and for server 2 use 5 years. Note that you have to use LCM. 3. Use incremental ROR analysis to decide between the servers at MARR = 28% See All Arwens Cos Che Save and Submit to save and submit Cho Save All Autoane alla summarized below. Server 1 Server 2 Forst cost, 211,298 200 000 50,000 year 1. plus 5000 per year for years 2, 3, and 4 (gradient) Net cath flow, S/year 35,000 70,000 maximum for yeats 5 on, even if the server is replaced Life, years 3 or 4 3 Case Study Exercises Use spreadsheet analysis to determine the following: 1. If the MARR - 28%, which server should be selected? Use the PW or AW method to make the selection. For serverse 3 and 4 and for server 2 use 5 years. Note that you have to use LCM. 3. Use incremental ROR analysis to decide between the servers at MARR = 28% See All Arwens Cos Che Save and Submit to save and submit Cho Save All Autoane alla
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
