Suppose that Algorithm1 has the running time (nlog2n) steps for input size n. Suppose that we...

   

Transcribed Image Text:

Suppose that Algorithm1 has the running time (nlog2n) steps for input size n. Suppose that we devise a Divide-and-Conquer algorithm that divides an input into two inputs half as big, and does D (n) = (1) steps to divide the problem and C (n) = (n) steps to combine the solutions to get a solution to the original input. Which algorithm is more efficient, Algorithm1 or the Divide-and-Conquer algorithm? O Algorithm1 is more efficient than the Divide-and-Conquer algorithm. O The Divide-and-Conquer algorithm is more efficient than the Algorithm1. O Default. O Both algorithms have the same running time complexity. Suppose that Algorithm1 has the running time (nlog2n) steps for input size n. Suppose that we devise a Divide-and-Conquer algorithm that divides an input into two inputs half as big, and does D (n) = (1) steps to divide the problem and C (n) = (n) steps to combine the solutions to get a solution to the original input. Which algorithm is more efficient, Algorithm1 or the Divide-and-Conquer algorithm? O Algorithm1 is more efficient than the Divide-and-Conquer algorithm. O The Divide-and-Conquer algorithm is more efficient than the Algorithm1. O Default. O Both algorithms have the same running time complexity.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

In analyzing the efficiency between Algorithm1 and the DivideandConquer algorithm described we are g... View the full answer