Suppose you're interested in studying state-level differences in mortality in the United States. A random sample of the mortality records of 1,000 California residents yields a mean age of death of 79.0 years with a standard deviation of two years. A random sample of the mortality records of 1,000 Texas residents, however, yields a mean age of death of 77.0 years with a standard deviation of four years. Test the hypothesis that there is a DIFFERENCE (the fact that the word "difference" is capitalized, bolded, and highlighted should give you a clue as to how to set this problem up) in the mean ages of death of California and Texas residents. Which of the following would be the most appropriate null hypothesis for the question above? Group of answer choices There is no difference in terms of the mean ages of death of California and Texas residents There is a difference in terms of the mean ages of death of California and Texas residents The mean age of death is higher for California residents than it is for Texas residents The mean age of death is lower for California residents than it is for Texas residents Does it really matter? I mean, the null hypothesis is going to offer little in terms of consolation to the families of these 2,000 people regardless of how it is phrased