$\backslash$table$[[$Pages$,$File,Insert,Format,Arrang,,View,are,Window,Help,$],[0,,,(7)$ W$,$ek $1$ Assi,gnmer,$nt-$Edit,,,,$],[125\%vv,+,v,,,$T$,,v,-=,\sqrt[\phantom{2}]{4},],[$Zoom$,\backslash$table$[[$Add Page$],[$work $101]],$Insert,Table,Chart,Text,Shape,Media,Comment,Format,Documer$]]$

On Sheet #$2,$ for each stakeholder you identify, indicate how much salience $($stakeholder power$)$ they have based on what their position is $($support or oppose$).$ Below you'll see an example showing the government as a stakeholder, with high salience, and believes UBER is responsible.

Lastly, briefly describe why you mapped your stakeholders the way you did. How did you define their salience? $($note: stakeholders are more salient when they have greater power, legitimacy, and urgency$).$

Finally, based on your stakeholder analysis and map, what do you think Uber should do in response to the bill introduced by Susan Bonilla, and why?