Task 7. From the six tuning rules, select the two norm response plots (i.e., the second...

 

Transcribed Image Text:

Task 7. From the six tuning rules, select the two norm response plots (i.e., the second plots) that you believe to be the most different. What insights do you believe these can provide on the results of the assignment? Make sure your MATLAB and Simulink filenames end with your initials (e.g., hextune2023.DER.m1x and cma03.2023.DER.slx); likewise, make sure your name appears in the Simulink window, the file header and figure titles, to identify your results from those of other students. This assignment is worth 100 points, broken down as follows: Technically correct results: 40 % Thoroughness of discussion, presentation, and interpretation of results: 50 % Computer program quality (for both the mlx files and Simulink window): 10% Discussion of results is critical to this CMA and carries a large weight. Please not only discuss and interpret your results, present these in an appealing format in the written document. Computer program quality refers to aspects of the livescript which enhance its readability (or alternatively, make it less readable) for the instructor and teaching assistant. Please submit all files separately on the course Canvas site, including submitting separate .mlx and .slx files for any extra credit work pursued. There may be additional instructions provided to the class prior to the submission deadline. Any submission with files sub- mitted in a single compressed folder or lacking files will not be graded. While students may seek assistance (as with any assignment) from either the instructor or teaching assistant; however, assistance requested needs to be reasonable in nature, with no debugging of code or similar problem-solving being done via email. Please be cognizant of the course Academic Integrity Policy in completing this assignment. Extra Credit Opportunity (25 pts). Create an additional Simulink file (and modify your .mlx file accordingly, or create a new one) that evaluates these PI tuning rules in a "bumpless" implementation for the proportional action (similar to what is described in EPA 8, Problem 2). This is a simple modification but you must pay attention to detail. Please note the instructor comments during lecture regarding this aspect of the assignment. Note that bumpless implementation will only impact setpoint tracking (disturbance rejection will remain unchanged). Document the extra credit portion by: 1. Including a copy of your additional Simulink window in the report document. 2. Re-visiting Task 5 (include all new simulation results, but you can limit your discussion to focus solely on the new set point tracking results). 3. Re-visting Task 6, item 1 (best and worst setpoint tracking) and item 3 (best tuning rule, overall). Has "bumpless" control action caused you to reconsider your previous choice of "best"? Make sure to include in your submission all extra credit files (i.e., .slx and .mlx; include a PDF export as well). Task 7. From the six tuning rules, select the two norm response plots (i.e., the second plots) that you believe to be the most different. What insights do you believe these can provide on the results of the assignment? Make sure your MATLAB and Simulink filenames end with your initials (e.g., hextune2023.DER.m1x and cma03.2023.DER.slx); likewise, make sure your name appears in the Simulink window, the file header and figure titles, to identify your results from those of other students. This assignment is worth 100 points, broken down as follows: Technically correct results: 40 % Thoroughness of discussion, presentation, and interpretation of results: 50 % Computer program quality (for both the mlx files and Simulink window): 10% Discussion of results is critical to this CMA and carries a large weight. Please not only discuss and interpret your results, present these in an appealing format in the written document. Computer program quality refers to aspects of the livescript which enhance its readability (or alternatively, make it less readable) for the instructor and teaching assistant. Please submit all files separately on the course Canvas site, including submitting separate .mlx and .slx files for any extra credit work pursued. There may be additional instructions provided to the class prior to the submission deadline. Any submission with files sub- mitted in a single compressed folder or lacking files will not be graded. While students may seek assistance (as with any assignment) from either the instructor or teaching assistant; however, assistance requested needs to be reasonable in nature, with no debugging of code or similar problem-solving being done via email. Please be cognizant of the course Academic Integrity Policy in completing this assignment. Extra Credit Opportunity (25 pts). Create an additional Simulink file (and modify your .mlx file accordingly, or create a new one) that evaluates these PI tuning rules in a "bumpless" implementation for the proportional action (similar to what is described in EPA 8, Problem 2). This is a simple modification but you must pay attention to detail. Please note the instructor comments during lecture regarding this aspect of the assignment. Note that bumpless implementation will only impact setpoint tracking (disturbance rejection will remain unchanged). Document the extra credit portion by: 1. Including a copy of your additional Simulink window in the report document. 2. Re-visiting Task 5 (include all new simulation results, but you can limit your discussion to focus solely on the new set point tracking results). 3. Re-visting Task 6, item 1 (best and worst setpoint tracking) and item 3 (best tuning rule, overall). Has "bumpless" control action caused you to reconsider your previous choice of "best"? Make sure to include in your submission all extra credit files (i.e., .slx and .mlx; include a PDF export as well).