Task Performance

Make a digest for each of the following cases.

A digest is a summary of the Supreme Court cases. It has three (3) parts: facts, issue, and ruling. The facts part consists only of the essential facts relevant to the ruling in the case while the issue should be relevant to the topic under which the case belongs. The ruling should answer the issue raised in the case.

1. Elements of an obligation
   • ASUNCION vs. CA, G.R. NO. 109125, December 2, 1994

2. Classification of obligations - as to basis and enforceability (Natural Obligations and Civil Obligations)
   • DBP vs. CONFESSOR, G.R. NO. L-48889 May 11, 1989

3. Sources of obligations

1. Obligations arising from law
   • PELAYO V. LAURON 12 Phil. 453

2. Obligations arising from contracts
   • METROPOLITAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY vs. ANA GRACE ROSALES AND YO YUK TO, G.R. No. 183204, January 13, 2014

3. Obligations arising from quasi-contract

1. negotiorum gestio

ADILLE vs. CA, G.R. NO. L-44546 January 29, 1988

2. solutio indebiti

ANDRES vs. MANUFACTURERS HANOVER & TRUST CORPORATION, G.R. NO. 82670

September 15, 1989

4. Obligations arising from delict

NAPOCOR vs. CA, G.R. NO. 124378, March 8, 2005

6. Nature and effects of obligation

1. Delay
   1. Mora Solvendi

SANTOS VENTURA HOCORMA FOUNDATION, INC., vs. SANTOS, G.R. NO. 153004, November 5, 2004

2. Mora Accipiendi

MANUEL vs. CA, G.R. NO. 95469 July 25, 1991

3. Compensatio Morae

CORTES vs. CA, G.R. NO. 126083, July 12, 2006

4. When demand not necessary

RODRIGO RIVERA VS. SPOUSES SALVADOR C. CHUA AND VIOLETA S. CHUA/ SPOUSES SALVADOR C. CHUA AND VIOLETA S. CHUA VS. RODRIGO RIVERA, G.R. Nos. 184458/184472. January 14, 2015 (1169)

2. Negligence

1. Degree of diligence

PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, MCGEE & CO., INC., G.R. NO. 162467, May 8, 2009

3. Fortuitous event

NAKPIL & SONS v. CA, G.R. NO. L-47851 April 15, 1988

7. Kinds of civil obligations

1. Pure obligations

HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORP. vs. BROQUEZA, G.R. NO. 178610 November 17, 2010 (1179)

2. Conditional obligations

1. Suspensive condition

REYES vs. TUPARAN, G.R. NO. 188064, June 1, 2011

2. Resolutory condition

CENTRAL PHILIPPINE UNIVERSITY vs. CA, G.R. NO. 112230. July 17, 1995

3. Obligations with a period

ROWENA R. SOLANTE vs. COMMISSION ON AUDIT et. al. G.R. No. 207348, August 19, 2014,

4. Solidary obligation

SPOUSES CHIN KONG WONG CHOI AND ANA O. CHUA VS. UNITED COCONUT PLANTERS BANK, G.R. No. 207747. March 11, 2015

5. Obligations with a penal clause

COUNTRY BANKERS V. COURT OF APPEALS 201 SCRA 458

8. Extinguishment of obligations

1. Payment or performance

PHILIPPINE COMMERCIAL INTERNATIONAL BANK (now BDO UNIBANK, INC.), vs. ARTURO P.

FRANCO, substituted by his heirs, namely: MAURICIA P. FRANCO, FLORIBEL P. FRANCO, AND ALEXANDER P. FRANC0, G.R. No. 180069, March 5, 2014 (1271)

2. Compensation

CESAR V. AREZA and LOLITA B. AREZA V EXPRESS SAVINGS BANK, INC. and MICHAEL POTENCIANO. G.R No. 176697, September 10, 2014

3. Novation

LEONARDO BOGNOT vs. RRI LENDING CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, DARIO J. BERNARDEZ, G.R. No. 180144, September 24, 2014