Question: TERMS IMPLIED IN FACT: IMPLICATION v INTERPRETATION Implication v interpretation (Attorney-General of Belize v Belize Telecom [2009] UKPC 10): tests not cumulative/alternative but have one

TERMS IMPLIED IN FACT: IMPLICATION v INTERPRETATION Implication v interpretation (Attorney-General of Belize v Belize Telecom [2009] UKPC 10): tests not cumulative/alternative but have one aim "reasonableness" as test for implication Marks & Spencer v BNP Paribas Securities [2015] UKSC 72: re-asserted business efficacy test kept implication distinct from interpretation clarified relationship between business efficacy and officious bystander tests

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!