Question: TERMS IMPLIED IN FACT: IMPLICATION v INTERPRETATION Implication v interpretation (Attorney-General of Belize v Belize Telecom [2009] UKPC 10): tests not cumulative/alternative but have one
TERMS IMPLIED IN FACT: IMPLICATION v INTERPRETATION Implication v interpretation (Attorney-General of Belize v Belize Telecom [2009] UKPC 10): tests not cumulative/alternative but have one aim "reasonableness" as test for implication Marks & Spencer v BNP Paribas Securities [2015] UKSC 72: re-asserted business efficacy test kept implication distinct from interpretation clarified relationship between business efficacy and officious bystander tests
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
