1. Test 4 variables in the data set using the chi-square Goodness of Fit test. Assume an equal chance of all categories for each variable.
2. Compute and report effect size.
3. Report all results (significant and non-significant) in paragraph style.

Proportion Test (N Outcomes) #1

Proportions - Cancer_Diagnosis
Level		Count	Proportion
No		Observed	77	0.706
	Expected	54.5	0.500
Yes		Observed	32	0.294
	Expected	54.5	0.500

Goodness of Fit
	df	p
18.6	1	<.001

Proportion Test (N Outcomes) #2

Proportions - Weight
Level		Count	Proportion
Underweight	Observed	15	0.138
	Expected	27.3	0.250
Normal Weight	Observed	31	0.284
	Expected	27.3	0.250
Overweight	Observed	17	0.156
	Expected	27.3	0.250
Obese	Observed	46	0.422
	Expected	27.3	0.250

Goodness of Fit
	df	p
22.8	3	<.001

Proportion Test (N Outcomes) #3

Proportions - Relationship
Level		Count	Proportion
Single	Observed	29	0.266
	Expected	36.3	0.333
Married	Observed	60	0.550
	Expected	36.3	0.333
Divorced	Observed	20	0.183
	Expected	36.3	0.333

Goodness of Fit
	df	p
24.2	2	<.001

Proportion Test (N Outcomes) #4

Proportions - Smoker
Level		Count	Proportion
No	Observed	47	0.431
	Expected	54.5	0.500
Yes	Observed	62	0.569
	Expected	54.5	0.500

Goodness of Fit
	df	p
2.06	1	0.151

1. Using a test of independent/association:
   1. Test if smoking status is independent of sex at birth.
   2. Test if diabetes diagnosis is independent of sex at birth.
   3. Test if cancer diagnosis is independent of relationship type.
   4. Test if sex at birth is independent of relationship type.
2. Calculate the effect size for each test.

Contingency Tables #1 Test if smoking status is independent of sex at birth.

Contingency Tables
	Sex
Smoker		Female	Male	Total
No	Observed	10	37	47
	Expected	22.4	24.6	47.0
	% within row	21.3%	78.7%	100.0%
	% within column	19.2%	64.9%	43.1%
	% of total	9.2%	33.9%	43.1%
Yes	Observed	42	20	62
	Expected	29.6	32.4	62.0
	% within row	67.7%	32.3%	100.0%
	% within column	80.8%	35.1%	56.9%
	% of total	38.5%	18.3%	56.9%
Total	Observed	52	57	109
	Expected	52.0	57.0	109.0
	% within row	47.7%	52.3%	100.0%
	% within column	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	% of total	47.7%	52.3%	100.0%

Tests
	Value	df	p
	23.1	1		<.001
N	109

Nominal
	Value
Phi-coefficient	0.461
Cramer's V	0.461

Contingency Tables #2Test if diabetes diagnosis is independent of sex at birth.

Contingency Tables
	Sex
Diabetic		Female	Male	Total
No	Observed	28	17	45
	Expected	21.5	23.5	45.0
	% within row	62.2%	37.8%	100.0%
	% within column	53.8%	29.8%	41.3%
	% of total	25.7%	15.6%	41.3%
Yes	Observed	24	40	64
	Expected	30.5	33.5	64.0
	% within row	37.5%	62.5%	100.0%
	% within column	46.2%	70.2%	58.7%
	% of total	22.0%	36.7%	58.7%
Total	Observed	52	57	109
	Expected	52.0	57.0	109.0
	% within row	47.7%	52.3%	100.0%
	% within column	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	% of total	47.7%	52.3%	100.0%

Tests
	Value	df	p
	6.47	1		0.011
N	109

Nominal
	Value
Phi-coefficient	0.244
Cramer's V	0.244

Contingency Tables #3 Test if cancer diagnosis is independent of relationship type.

Contingency Tables
	Relationship
Cancer_Diagnosis		Single	Married	Divorced	Total
No	Observed	22	50	5	77
	Expected	20.49	42.4	14.13	77.0
	% within row	28.6%	64.9%	6.5%	100.0%
	% within column	75.9%	83.3%	25.0%	70.6%
	% of total	20.2%	45.9%	4.6%	70.6%
Yes	Observed	7	10	15	32
	Expected	8.51	17.6	5.87	32.0
	% within row	21.9%	31.3%	46.9%	100.0%
	% within column	24.1%	16.7%	75.0%	29.4%
	% of total	6.4%	9.2%	13.8%	29.4%
Total	Observed	29	60	20	109
	Expected	29.00	60.0	20.00	109.0
	% within row	26.6%	55.0%	18.3%	100.0%
	% within column	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	% of total	26.6%	55.0%	18.3%	100.0%

Tests
	Value	df	p
	25.1	2		<.001
N	109

Nominal
	Value
Phi-coefficient	NaN
Cramer's V	0.480

Contingency Tables #4 Test if sex at birth is independent of relationship type.

Contingency Tables
	Relationship
Sex		Single	Married	Divorced	Total
Female	Observed	10	29	13	52
	Expected	13.8	28.6	9.54	52.0
	% within row	19.2%	55.8%	25.0%	100.0%
	% within column	34.5%	48.3%	65.0%	47.7%
	% of total	9.2%	26.6%	11.9%	47.7%
Male	Observed	19	31	7	57
	Expected	15.2	31.4	10.46	57.0
	% within row	33.3%	54.4%	12.3%	100.0%
	% within column	65.5%	51.7%	35.0%	52.3%
	% of total	17.4%	28.4%	6.4%	52.3%
Total	Observed	29	60	20	109
	Expected	29.0	60.0	20.00	109.0
	% within row	26.6%	55.0%	18.3%	100.0%
	% within column	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	% of total	26.6%	55.0%	18.3%	100.0%

Tests
	Value	df	p
	4.44	2		0.109
N	109

Nominal
	Value
Phi-coefficient	NaN
Cramer's V	0.202