Question: thank you Questions 7-10 Using either technique, explain the steps you used to determine if the correlation was significant (alpha = .05, two-tailed). Include any
thank you

Questions 7-10 Using either technique, explain the steps you used to determine if the correlation was significant (alpha = .05, two-tailed). Include any numerical values that you Popular wisdom suggests that when a woman is sexually attracted to a person, used. she touches or plays with her hair more than normal. To test this hypothesis, suppose a researcher has 82 heterosexual female participants interact with a male actor in a "simulated date." During the interaction, the number of times each + B IYA . A . LEX' X, E participant touches her hair is recorded. Afterwards, the participants are asked to rate the attractiveness of the man on a scale from 1(less attractive) to 10 (more 12pt Paragraph attractive). The Pearson's correlation coefficient for hair touches and attractiveness rating is r =+.25. 9 1 point Based on your answer to the previous question, which of the following is the correct conclusion? Make sure whether p >/ .05. O There is a statistically significant association between the amount of hair touching and attraction, r = .25, n = 82, p <.05. o there is not a statistically significant association between the amount of hair touching and attraction r=".25," n="82," p> .05. O There is NOT a statistically significant association between the amount of hair touching and attraction, r = .25, n = 82, p <.05 point what percent of the variability in hair touching is associated with how attractive participants found man>
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
