Thanks for sharing the latest data on our vwious human mesource intiatives. Pat of ahat rm punhing us to do in thia area is to be more focused in what we offer and ensure that our choices are based on evidence. With thit in mind, Tre been revtewning lie impacts of our tident development programs across the oompeny, I thisk thers is a pood opportinity to streamline what we do for our employese in RAD. There ase two cument lmining intiatives in RaD that I Think we need to evaluate with good of offering only one of them neat year.

From my evaluation R appears that the Design Thinking trining program has rediosd hrnover by $2$ k and incrased productivity by $6$K$.$ The other triining program $($Tearing with Excelenoel has reduced tumover by $4$W and hereased productivity by $4\%.$ Our data show that every $1\%$ of hurnover costs us $$1000$ per anplopee and every $2\%$ of productivity gains us $$1500$ per employee.

Assurning that these programs cost the same amount, which of the following conclusions can be dawn fom these data?

Rich Carter

Bloard Member, Itaman Resources $|$ Andrews

Corporation

The programs heve comparnale benefts se the progrwn that coets less le delver chould be relained.

The Tearing with Eucelence raining progam whould be retained.

Eliminativg the Teaning with Excelience training progran wall reduce poductity moe Man elminating the other progam.