That's right!

The term "due process", as used in the

facts of the case, seems to require

fairness. The International Shoe

corporation appears to argue that it

would be unfair for the State of

Washington to tax them.

Great work so far, keep it up$!$

What is interstate commerce?

Commercial transactions between the U$.$S$.$

and foreign countries.

Commercial transactions between two or

more states.

Opening a retail store in one state.

Commercial transactions solely within a state.

their company because it was incorporated in the state of Delaware.

International Shoe also argued that it did not have an agent registered in the

state of Washington, no permanent office in the state, and that it did not $"$do

business" in Washington. It also claimed that the UCA statute violated the

due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the commerce clause

of Article $1,$ Section $8,$ Clause $3$ of the U$.$S$.$ Constitution.

Due Process Clause: $"$No State shall make or enforce any law which shall

abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor

shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due

process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal

protection of the laws."

Commerce Clause: Grants Congress the authority $"$To regulate

Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with

the Indian Tribes." There is a prohibition, implicit in the Commerce

clat$$se acainst states nassind lenislation that discriminates adainst or