Read the overview below and complete the activities that follow.

The 1933 and 1934 acts are different in the way they protect investors and the burden of proof required. The 1933 Act pertains to those acquiring an initial distribution of a security; the 1934 Act is for anyone buying or selling the security.

CONCEPT REVIEW:

Auditors have different liability/responsibility under the different acts. For example, under the 1933 Act, the third party does not need to prove reliance on the financial statements; under the 1934 Act, the third party must prove reliance. There is also a difference relating to which third parties the auditor is liable to.

Transcribed Image Text:

1. The requires registration of an initial stock sale. 2. The 1933 Act requires to prove a loss and misleading financial statements. 3. Under the 1934 Act, third parties must prove 4. The 1934 Act protects any person buying or the security. 5. The 1933 and 1934 acts include provisions for civil and charges against CPAS. 1. The requires registration of an initial stock sale. 2. The 1933 Act requires to prove a loss and misleading financial statements. 3. Under the 1934 Act, third parties must prove 4. The 1934 Act protects any person buying or the security. 5. The 1933 and 1934 acts include provisions for civil and charges against CPAS.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

1 The 1933 Act requires registration of an initial stock sale 2 The 1933 Act requires third party ... View the full answer