The "blue wall" may sometimes protect the innocent, but it can also shield the guilty and prevent organizations from self$-$correcting. Transparency and accountability are generally seen as more constructive for building trust in the long run. In essence, I$\text{'}$m for it because It promotes loyalty and trust among police officers. Officers may feel they need to cover for each other in a dangerous job to ensure everyone's safety. Whistleblowing could undermine the bond between partners. It also prevents frivolous complaints or investigations from affecting the careers of good officers. Some accusations against police could be false or misconstrued. Protecting each other from unfair scrutiny is important.

on the contrary, It damages police legitimacy and trust with the public. When officers are seen as protecting their own above all else, it fuels perceptions that police are unaccountable. It undermines the goal of protecting communities. It can enable misconduct to go unreported and unaddressed. Sweeping problems under the rug often allows them to fester and spread. Upstanding officers would want issues fixed for the good of the department and profession. Loyalty should be to justice and the law $-$ not other individuals. While the job is dangerous, police derive their authority from serving citizens. Covering up actions that violate rights or the law goes against this duty. What do you think about this input?