Question: The buzz about DDC is growing. Before negotiations with Boeing can be completed, DDC receives a buyout proposal from Silverpond Partners for $60/sh in cash,

The buzz about DDC is growing. Before negotiations with Boeing can be completed, DDC receives a buyout proposal from Silverpond Partners for $60/sh in cash, a 60% premium to the expected IPO price. Silverpond and Golib Direct Lending Fund are finalizing the terms of a $150MM Unsecured Term Loan (UTL) with an interest rate of 8%. Golib is proposing a negative covenant in the UTL that requires DDC to maintain an Fixed Charge Coverage ratio of 2.0x. The Fixed Coverage ratio is defined as: (EBITDA+Rent Exp) / (Int Exp + Rent Exp). Assuming the loan closes and funds on 1/1/20. Based on the pro-forma projection for 2020 set-forth below, what is the pro-forma Fixed Charge Coverage ratio?

The buzz about DDC is growing. Before negotiations with Boeing can be

A.

1.8x

B.

3.6x

C.

2.0x

D.

3.3x

E.

2.5x

Lenders often insist on Fixed Charge Coverage Covenants because:

A.

Maximizing coverage will lower the firms WACC and improve its valuation

B.

A minimum coverage requirement will improve the firms leverage ratio

C.

Maximizing coverage will ensure lenders earn the most interest income

D.

In the event of a default, maximizing coverage will improve the lenders relative recovery compared to other pari passu claim holders

E.

Of economic volatility

The proposed UTL also includes a standard Restricted Payment provision (RP). Assuming the loan closes, on the day after the closing (at which point the RP basket =$0) which of the following payments would be permitted under the RP (chose all that apply):

A loan from DDC's restricted subsidiary to DDC.

A loan from DDC's restricted subsidiary to Angel.

A payoff of a maturing bond of an unrestricted subsidiary by DDC

The repurchase by DDC of Angel's stock from his estate following his untimely death.

The repayment of a bond of a restricted subsidiary by DDC because the bond contained a covenant that limited the transferability of the subsidiary's intellectual property.

The repayment of a bond of a restricted subsidiary by an unrestricted subsidiary because the bond contained a covenant that limited the transferability of the restricted subsidiary's intellectual property.

DDC PF Inc Statement 2020PF Revenue 200,000 COGS 80,000 Gross Margin 120,000 SG&A 45,000 R&D 35,000 Rent Exp 10,000 Interest Exp 12,000 Depreciation 8,000 |Pre-Tax Income 45,000 Taxes 9,450 Net Income 4,200 DDC PF Inc Statement 2020PF Revenue 200,000 COGS 80,000 Gross Margin 120,000 SG&A 45,000 R&D 35,000 Rent Exp 10,000 Interest Exp 12,000 Depreciation 8,000 |Pre-Tax Income 45,000 Taxes 9,450 Net Income 4,200

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Finance Questions!