The case that defined the modern day distinction between substantial performance and material breach isJacobs and Young v. Kent.

http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/archives/jacob_kent.htm

After readingJacob and Youngs v. Kent:

[a] What was the alleged breach of contract?

[b] Was the breach minor or material, and on what facts did the course base its decision?

[c] What was the measure of damages?

[d] Do you agree with the court's decision or the Dissent?Please explain fully.