The central issues in The Constitution Behind Bars revolve around the balancing act between the rights of inmates and the needs of correctional institutions to maintain order and instill discipline. Explain your choices in this scenario by addressing the following questions:

One of the primary arguments against the use of solitary confinement is that the practice irreparably damages the psyches of inmates, most of whom will be released from prison at some point in the future. When disciplining inmates behind bars, should prison officials take into consideration the long-term impact of such discipline of the inmate's physical and mental well-being? Why or why not?

Why might American courts be tempted to employ a "hands-off" standard to actions taken by correctional officials and staff when it comes to prison management, disciplining inmates, and other issues involving the reach of the U.S. Constitution behind bars? Do you favor a "hands-off" approach or an "inmate's rights" approach to prisoner law? Explain your answers.