The contracts you will be using are in the Contracts Module.

There is one question for this Contract $2.$ I am looking for the ability to read and comprehend the contract so

the appropriate contract clause can be applied to the questions connected with each contract. In order to

answer the contract fact scenario, you will also need to be able to identify the legal concept$($s$)$ that is applicable

to the situation described. This is an analysis so please treat it as such. Your personal opinion is not appropriate.

There is a correct answer$($s$)$ for the question as several legal concepts apply. If a student discusses a different

legal theory for answering the question, partial points will be given. In cases of complete or partial answers, text

references are mandatory to support the remedy proposed by the student. A text reference that has no bearing

on the remedy or legal arguments will be counted as $"$no text". For example, if any contract has an issue of risk

of loss, referencing the text on contract formation will not meet the requirement. The sections of the text that

you have read contain all the information you need for this analysis.

Please remember to reference the applicable parts of the contract that you are using to answer each question. Your

response should be in IRAC Writing Format.

A student will be given $4$ points for the text reference, $4$ points for the contract reference, with $15$ points for the

analysis itself, $4$ points for proper IRAC formatting.

The remaining $3$ points will be given as a spelling$/$grammar score. Following is the prompt.

UCC Sales Contract

The following question is based on the Sales Contract found in the Contracts Module. Please reference the

Sales Contract by clause number as you answer the questions. Remember, this is a contract under the UCC.

Essay $(2$ complete paragraphs minimum per essay with text and contract references to support your answers$)$

You contend that you received non$-$conforming goods as a result of an ambiguity in the contract. You ordered

goods thinking you would get a particular product. You wanted Rawlings ROMLB baseballs. That was the

original oral telephonic communication when you first contacted the selling merchant. You both talked about

and agreed on Rawlings ROMLB baseballs. Thereafter, in additional phone conversations, you and the seller just

used the phrase "baseballs". The seller prepared a written contract and sent it to the buyer for review and

signature. The contract was signed by both parties. The selling merchant then shipped High School Baseballs

that are in perfect condition but they are not ROMLB baseballs as they are slightly less dense and have raised

seams. The selling merchant believes the goods are conforming. Upon receipt and inspection of the goods, what

are all your merchant options under the contract and at law?