The correct option is: 1. A fact will always be relevant if from it an inference can be drawn about a fact in issue. Here's an explanation for each statement: True. A fact is considered relevant if it can logically influence the determination of a fact in issue. False. Hearsay evidence is in principle inadmissible not because it is irrelevant, but because it cannot be cross-examined and its reliability cannot be tested. False. If a logical inference can be drawn from evidence about a fact in issue, the evidence is relevant. However, relevant evidence might still be inadmissible for other reasons, such as if it violates certain rules of evidence like hearsay, privilege, or if its probative value is substantially outweighed by its potential for prejudice, confusion, or waste of time. False. Not all relevant evidence will be admissible. Evidence must be both relevant and not excluded by any rule of evidence (such as hearsay, privilege, or undue prejudice) to be admissible