The Expert witness's role is multi-faceted, and the supreme court has detailed what governs the admissibility of expert evidence. When an expert is hired for one side (defense or plaintiff/prosecutor) how can they balance their opinions, work for the client, and meet the duties of an expert? Do you think this is even realistic?

(2). The charter was covered and the context that it can apply to someone acting at the behest of a state agent. Can you think of any situations where this may not be clear, and/or the positives of this rule and how it could be used to a defendants advantage.

(3). Provide examples of the 4 different types of judicial evidence and any concerns you may have on that type of evidence in regard to evidentiary value.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Balancing Duties as an Expert Witness 1 Balancing Opinions Advocacy and Expertise An expert witness faces a complex challenge balancing their independent expertise with their clients interests and the ... View the full answer