The final column in partial table 2 below shows the unadjusted logistic regression odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval [95% CI] from a case-control study examining if signs of infection during pregnancy (as compared to the reference condition of not having each sign) increase the odds of the offspring developing type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), from Malcova, et al. Which ONE statement is a correct interpretation of a result from this table?M10_Q10.jpgGroup of answer choicesDevelopment of T1DM significantly decreases the odds of developing skin rash, as evidenced by the odds ratio being less than 1.00.Development of a diarrhea in pregnancy significantly increases the odds of the offspring developing T1DM, because the 95% confidence interval exceeds 1.00.Development of diarrhea in pregnancy is not significantly associated with the offspring developing T1DM because the 95% confidence interval includes 1.00.Development of a diarrhea in pregnancy significantly decreases the odds of the offspring developing T1DM, as evidenced by the confidence interval including a value less than 1.00.

Table 2 Distribution of studied parameters in children with TIDM and control patients TIDM % Controls % OR [95% CI] Signs attributable to infections during pregnancy Fever >38 C 78/693 11 149/1244 12 0.93 [0.70-1.25] Dianhoca 20/689 3 34/1 201 3 1.03 [0.59-1.80] Skin rash 12/749 N 38/1 308 3 0.54 [0.28-1.05]