The First Amendment to the US Constitution provides in part...$$Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech.$$ If a Judge was a $$natural law$$ thinking Judge, the Judge would most likely rule as follows in a freedom of speech case:

Group of answer choices

The word $$speech$$ must be strictly$/$positively followed to not include non verbal acts of communication

The word $$speech$$ must be viewed more broadly to include non verbal acts of communication such as hand gestures, wearing of ribbons, etc.

The word $$speech$$ only means verbal acts of communication and not hand gestures, wearing of ribbons, etc.

The first amendment does not protect written, non$-$verbal or other acts that are not speech