The first picture is the original assignment and the second picture is one of my classmates assignment. Please answer my classmates post with 4-5 sentences. Thanks in advance.

Hypothetical Fact Situation Pan American Airlines (PanAm), an airline, operated a large maintenance and overhaul base for its airplanes in Atlanta, Georgia. Because of its essential role, the stores department at the base operated around the clock, 365 days per year. The employees at the base were represented by the International Association of Pilots and Airplane Workers (Union). PanAm and Union entered into a collective bargaining agreement that included a seniority system for the assignment of jobs and shifts. PanAm hired Harry Lardinam to work as a clerk in the stores department. Soon after beginning work, Lardinam joined the Universal Creator Church, which does not allow its members to work from sunset on Friday until sunset on Saturday and on certain religious holidays. Lardinam, who had the second-lowest seniority within the stores department, did not have enough seniority to observe his Sabbath regularly. When Lardinam asked for special consideration, PanAm offered to allow him to take his Sabbath off if he could switch shifts with another employee-union member. None of the other employees would do so. PanAm refused Lardinam's request for a four-day work week because it would have had to hire and train a part-time worker to work on Saturdays or incur the cost of paying overtime to an existing full-time worker on Saturdays. Lardinam sued PanAm for religious discrimination, in violation of Title VII. Discussion Questions: Toric Questions: 1. Explain whether or not you think PanAm's actions violate Title VII, including any impact on both the company and other employees. 2. Explain what extent, if any, it matters when or where Lardinam become a member of the Universal Creator Church? Explain. 3. If in metropolitan Omaha a company with 20 employees could show undue hardship because a key customer demands only to be served by White people, could the company hire only White people? Why or why not? Reflection Questions 1. What specific knowledge and information did you gain from the learning about Title VII, and how might these shape your experiences now? in the future? 2. Explain how following Title VIl positively affects a company's operations. Discuss whether there are any downsides to following Title VII. 3. What are the social and ethical issues involved with the subject matter of this assignment? 3 hours ago Mafaz Mohammed Ali Mafaz Mohammed Overal Rating 4 4 Question 1. This is a serious situation which puts the existing employees and the organization in a tricky situation. I understand that religious discrimination is based on religious practices or religion. Harry has the freedom to exercise his religion but there is need to look at the costs incured by the company if they allow the him to work for four days. According to the instructors notes on Opportunity on Employment, " The right of an employee to practice religion is not absolute. Tide VII requires an employer to reasonably accommodate the religious observance, practices or beliefs, this cannot cause the employer to have an undue hardship." Courts will look to the size of the employer, the importance of the employee's position and the availability of other workers. For this reason, the Pan Am is being put in undue hardship where they would have to pay another employee to cover for the day and holidays. Again, employees have refused to change shifts with him which means there are no available options. I think that PanAm does not violate Title Vil because they have offered Harry an option and otherwise they would pay Question 2 It matters that Harry joined the church after he was hired. I think that the company did not show any discrimination because it did not have to since Harry was not a member of the new church. If he was, it would have been different because they would have discussed the matters of his sabbath and perhaps allowed for shifts but now it is a different case. When hiring someone, employers take into account their religion and that means that PanAm did it for Harry. Now they case is different. Question 3 Firstly, the company has 20 employees. Applying equal employment for all races would imply that there are both black and white employees in the company. A key customer, in as much as he brings hardships to the company by forcing the company to be discriminant should not come before employee protection Secondly, the customer can be served by any person he wishes but that does not mean that the company needs to change its hiring preferances. Reflection Questions Quetion 1 Title Vil was a bit complicated for me. I know that companies are nit allowed to duscriminate against religion, race, color, or even nationality. However, the issue of religion is a bit confusing for me. There are some religious organizations which are allowed to hire only people of their religion yet that is not considered as discrimination based on religion. I also learned that Title VII is not an absolute protection for employees religion. Again, the gap between women and men in the workplace has drawn a lot of heated debates regarding the work input and what is the ideal payment. The wage gap between genders is prohibited by the Equal pay Act of 1963 (EPA). This has changed my perspective regarding gender discrimination in the work place. It does not only depend on positions but also pay. Question 2 Areas that may give rise to violations include recruiting, hiring promoting, transferring training, disciplining, discharging, assigning work, measuring performance, or providing benefits. A company benefits from following the Title VII in that employees will give their best knowing they are respected. Additionally, the company hires the best regardless of the age, gender, color, religion, or nationality. The downsides of this is the isse with important clients who like to discriminate Question 3 The ethical issue about this is that there might arise questions about what is right and what is not. For instance to what extent is sexual harasment extreme? The ethical implications of sexual harassment are concerned with questions of what is acceptable and unacceptable within the workplace from the perspective of both women and men