Question: The High Court's decision in Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387: Select one: Q a. Restricted the doctrine of equitable estoppel

The High Court's decision in Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387: Select one: Q a. Restricted the doctrine of equitable estoppel such that, where the contract is of a commercial nature, the doctrine will not apply O b. Extended the doctrine of equitable estoppel such that it applies even where there is no pre-existing contractual relationship between the parties 0 c. Extended the doctrine of promissory estoppel such that it applies even where the promisor does not create or encourage the false assumption of the promisee Q d. Restricted the doctrine of promissory estoppel G such that where an innocent third party has been affected, no remedy can be ordered

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!