The in-degree centralization (i.e., In-Centralization) was not low (0.242). What does that tell us? 24.2% of...

Transcribed Image Text:

The in-degree centralization (i.e., In-Centralization) was not low (0.242). What does that tell us? 24.2% of the advice-sharing happened among the core group of this company, while the remaining advice- sharing occurred among the more peripheral teams. There was a wide spread between the number of individuals from which the most central individual in the network were giving advice as compared to the other individuals O There were a lot of transitive triads, suggesting that there were a lot of three-individuals. O All of the above The in-degree centralization (i.e., In-Centralization) was not low (0.242). What does that tell us? 24.2% of the advice-sharing happened among the core group of this company, while the remaining advice- sharing occurred among the more peripheral teams. There was a wide spread between the number of individuals from which the most central individual in the network were giving advice as compared to the other individuals O There were a lot of transitive triads, suggesting that there were a lot of three-individuals. O All of the above

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The indegree centralization ie InCentralization was not low 0242 What does ... View the full answer