The issue raised in this case is the conflict between Malaysia Airlines Berhad $($MAB$)$ and Wan Amran Wan Bulat regarding the termination of the latter's employment as an Airline Steward. The key issue here is the failure of Wan Amran to meet the weight requirements set by the company, which posed supposed safety risks and affected the company's image. MAB argues that termination was the only appropriate course of action, while Wan Amran disputes this, suggesting alternative consequences such as grounding or wage reduction. The validity of safety concerns and the discretionary nature of termination are also discussed. Ultimately, the case hinges on whether the termination was justified given Wan Amran's failure to meet weight requirements and the alleged safety risks. The company argues that termination was the only appropriate course of action, while Wan Amran disputes this, suggesting alternative consequences such as grounding or wage reduction. In this issue is the dismissal of Wan Amran justified?