The law firm of Griffin & Gunz hired Sheila Kenzie, a forensic accountant, to provide evidence...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
The law firm of Griffin & Gunz hired Sheila Kenzie, a forensic accountant, to provide evidence in a dispute involving a wealthy family that controls companies domestically and internationally. The family is well known and very high profile. Basically, the argument is between one individual, Edward, and the other family members. Edward alleges that other family members have been charging personal expenses to the company causing it to lose value. He is adamant that the company's share value has been affected significantly by the profligate actions of the other family members. As a matter of routine, Sheila signed a confidentiality letter before undertaking the job, indicating that all the information available to her will be kept confidential under all circumstances. Edward listed a number of examples where family members have put through personal expenditures in a memo to Griffin & Gunz. Sheila's job is to gather evidence to support Edward's allegations. Sheila completed the work and incurred significant costs both in time and out of pocket. The work was extensive and the fee for services was fairly significant. Sheila prepared a draft report and provided it to the lawyer. Basically, she found little support for the allegations made by Edward. As a matter of fact, it appeared from Sheila's investigation that most of the wrong doing was by Edward rather than the other family members. Edward and his lawyer were not very happy and asked for the report to be changed. They indicated quite clearly that they would not pay for Sheila's services unless the report was changed. As Edward put it, "why should I pay you to provide damning evidence against me? I hired you to find damning evidence against the other members of my blankety blank family, not me." What should Sheila do? Should she sue? (The confidentiality letter would seem to preclude suit being brought by the forensic accountant. Would the answer to this be changed if the confidentiality letter had not been signed?) The law firm of Griffin & Gunz hired Sheila Kenzie, a forensic accountant, to provide evidence in a dispute involving a wealthy family that controls companies domestically and internationally. The family is well known and very high profile. Basically, the argument is between one individual, Edward, and the other family members. Edward alleges that other family members have been charging personal expenses to the company causing it to lose value. He is adamant that the company's share value has been affected significantly by the profligate actions of the other family members. As a matter of routine, Sheila signed a confidentiality letter before undertaking the job, indicating that all the information available to her will be kept confidential under all circumstances. Edward listed a number of examples where family members have put through personal expenditures in a memo to Griffin & Gunz. Sheila's job is to gather evidence to support Edward's allegations. Sheila completed the work and incurred significant costs both in time and out of pocket. The work was extensive and the fee for services was fairly significant. Sheila prepared a draft report and provided it to the lawyer. Basically, she found little support for the allegations made by Edward. As a matter of fact, it appeared from Sheila's investigation that most of the wrong doing was by Edward rather than the other family members. Edward and his lawyer were not very happy and asked for the report to be changed. They indicated quite clearly that they would not pay for Sheila's services unless the report was changed. As Edward put it, "why should I pay you to provide damning evidence against me? I hired you to find damning evidence against the other members of my blankety blank family, not me." What should Sheila do? Should she sue? (The confidentiality letter would seem to preclude suit being brought by the forensic accountant. Would the answer to this be changed if the confidentiality letter had not been signed?)
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
Sheila is in a tough situationbut suing might not be the best course of actionHeres why Confidentiality Letter Impedes Lawsuit The confidentiality let... View the full answer
Related Book For
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these law questions
-
The Crazy Eddie fraud may appear smaller and gentler than the massive billion-dollar frauds exposed in recent times, such as Bernie Madoffs Ponzi scheme, frauds in the subprime mortgage market, the...
-
PROMPT: During the workplace investigation interviews, you will be interviewing 6 witnesses. Outline a list of questions or topics you want to ask each witness. You may format your outline in a...
-
As mentioned in Section 5.6, Sainte-Venants principle will allow particular boundary conditions to be replaced by their statically equivalent resultant. For problems (b), (c), (d),and (f) in Exercise...
-
If you had been assigned the task of forecasting the demand for MP3 players when they were a new product, how might you have approached the problem?
-
Determine the amount of tax liability in the following situations. In all cases, the taxpayer is using the filing status of married filing jointly. a. Taxable income of $62,449 that includes a...
-
Indicate the functions associated with the investing cycle.
-
EZ-Seat, Inc., manufactures two types of reclining chairs, Standard and Ergo. Ergo provides support for the body through a complex set of sensors and requires great care in manufacturing to avoid...
-
Make this ERD diagram On Microsoft Visio Software And Upload the answer here. ER Diagram APP/website
-
A well-established company in the pet food processing industry in Canada that specializes in high-quality plant-based (vegan) pet food is looking to hire a temporary foreign worker. The company...
-
Name the move or moves that will return the Rubik's cube to standard position after making the move shown in Problems 38-51. \(B U\)
-
Determine whether each of the figures in Problems 30-37 will be a solution to an Instant Insanity puzzle.
-
Repeat Problem 53, except change the stakes to \(\$ 110\) and \(\$ 100\), respectively. Data from problem 53 Suppose you are in class and your instructor makes you the following legitimate offer....
-
Show the result of the moves on Rubik's cube indicated in Problems 3-29. Remember that R, F, L, B, T, and U mean rotate \(90^{\circ}\) clockwise the right, front, left, back, top, and under faces,...
-
Determine whether each of the figures in Problems 30-37 will be a solution to an Instant Insanity puzzle.
-
Define a value chain and the significance of the center of gravity. Also provide an example of a value chain from your place of work or from a company that you have researched.
-
A researcher reports a significant two-way between-subjects ANOVA, F(3, 40) = 2.96. State the decision to retain or reject the null hypothesis for this test.
-
Brooks Development Corporation (BDC) faces the following capital budgeting decision. Six real estate projects are available for investment. The net present value and expenditures required for each...
-
Morgan Inc. is planning the purchase of one of the component parts it needs for its finished product. The anticipated demands for the component for the next 12 periods are shown in the following...
-
John White is the program scheduling manager for the television channel CCFO. John would like to plan the schedule of television shows for next Wednesday evening. The table below lists nine shows...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App