The lecture discussed what happens after the jury comes back with a verdict. Sometimes, it is a verdict our client is not pleased to hear, or one that still presents challenges if the opponent appeals or refuses to pay.

Following our discussion from last week, consider the client who had inconsistencies in their testimony relating to injuries after an auto accident. The client stated that she constantly complained of pain to her friends and family after the accident. Her own mother said she did not let the injuries slow her down. The client friend told the jury about beach trips and margaritas during time off from work. After polling the jury, you feel confident that the client did not win at trial because the jury did not believe she was as seriously injured as she claimed. There are medical records that demonstrate ongoing medical care and physical therapy for months after the accident, but the client and both witnesses have showed you Facebook posts where the client was actively exercising, dancing, and seemingly living a full life during the supposed recovery period.

Recall the lecture material on Baker and List protocol for breaking bad news to a client. In your initial post address the following prompts:

• Describe how you would explain to the client the following: The jury had ruled against her. They did not like the inconsistencies in her testimony and that of her friends and family.
• Propose a follow-up plan.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Answer I understand this is a challenging situation for the client but there are a few important ste... View the full answer