The old hazard analysis methods were not updated to take into account the new types of accident scenarios that were occurring and to treat the operator as an integral part of the larger system. As a result, hazard analyses often miss possible scenarios, especially those involving software or humans. To make progress, we need the psychology, human factors, and engineering communities to come together to create more powerful hazard analysis methods and therefore ways to improve the system designthat are appropriate for the systems being built and operated today.

Describe the potential approach from an extended model of accident causality called STAMP (System-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes) that better describes the role humans and software play in accidents today? preferably in aviation sector.