The opening case explores the ongoing battle between aircraft makers Airbus and Boeing. Both companies have accused the other of receiving unfair government subsidies designed to give them a competitive advantage, and both the United States and the European Union have taken their complaints to the World Trade Organization (WTO). In response to a 2006 complaint from the United States regarding perceived assistance to Airbus, the WTO issued a ruling indicating that the Europe-based Airbus had indeed received unfair subsidies. After Airbus failed to comply with WTO orders to remove the subsidies, the WTO issued another warning to Airbus. Ironically, the United States is unlikely to pursue Europes noncompliance with the WTO rulings as Boeing recently found itself under fire for accepting tax breaks from the state of Washington.

QUESTION 2: In its early years, Airbus received subsidies for 100 percent of its development costs. Discuss this situation. Is there a time when subsidies should be considered acceptable? Why or why not?

Write a lengthy Answer please!