Question: The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the

The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Imagine that the federal government banned the production, possession, and use of semi-automatic weapons. On the matter of whether such a ban is constitutional, how might the opinion of a Supreme Court justice that supports the collective-right theory of the Second Amendment differ from the opinion of a Supreme Court justice that supports the individual-right theory of the Second Amendment? Be sure to explain how your answers flow out of the collective-right and individual right theories, respectively.

Step by Step Solution

3.37 Rating (166 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 As per the given amendment it can be seen that a well regulated military force is the major requir... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!