Question: The q , exception recognizes that a warrantless entry by law enforcement officials may be legal when there is a compelling need for official action

The

q,

exception recognizes that a warrantless entry by law enforcement officials may be legal when there is a compelling need for official action and no time to get a warrant.

emerging situational need

emergency situational requirement

exigent circumstances

emergency exigent circumstances

The q, exception recognizes that a warrantless entry by law enforcement

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer

Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image

Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock

Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!

Deena overhears someone criticizing her for talking too much in class. Deena is mean at first, but then thinks more deeply about why that person said that. Deena concludes that she could talk a...

Subject: Police Operations Be sure to make sure understand the concepts of the 4th Amendment and, specifically, Probable Cause. Then, read this discussion prompt and type and answer with an...

Based on below case, write brief case which includes following parts: Title citation procedure history facts Legal question Decisions (Holdings) Reasoning (Rationale)( has to be in bullets or number...

Cite as: 573 U. S. ____ (2014) 1 Opinion of the Court NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are...

Please reply to the issue, facts, rule of law, application and conclusion by using the the text below. Issue: What overarching issue was the court addressing or resolving (one questions not a...

Issue: What overarching issue was the court addressing or resolving (one questions not a paragraph just one sentence encapsulating) Facts: What are the facts that the court described and cared about?...

Prepare a legal brief on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. ___ (2011) which can be found at this link. www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/09-1272.ZS.html The case is also...

Need to write brief case which must include: Title, Citation and Procedural History 2. Facts of the Case 3. Issues 4. Decisions (Holdings) 5. Reasoning (Rationale) 6. Separate Opinions 7. Analysis...

Page 3 of 4 Carpenter v. United States ACTIVITY: Read Carpenter v. United States, as set forth below, and answer the following questions: o What are the facts of Carpenter? o What was the issue? That...

Page 1 1 of 106 DOCUMENTS DAVID LEON RILEY, Petitioner (No. 13-132) v. CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES, Petitioner (No. 13-212) v. BRIMA WURIE 13-132, 13-212 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 134 S. Ct....

499 Everyone Knows the Game: Legal Consciousness in the Hawaiian Cockfight Kathryne M. Young Past legal consciousness research has revealed a great deal about what individuals think and do with...

Democrats vs Republicans COLLAPSE Google "politician goes to jail". How many are each political party? Can we say there is a difference between to two political parties?

Zip Company pays its employees every Friday. On January 4, 20XX, the Company paid $2,200 for the 5 days beginning the previous December 31. Prepare the adjusting entry on December 31. Omit...

Required: Zeda Incorporated, a U . S . MNC , is considering making a foxed direct investment in Derimark. The Danish government has offered Zeda a concessionary loan of DKK 1 4 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 at a...

Make a statement of cashflows in good form. X X M Inbox 2,50 x M Logistics : * Course: ST: X|MyDrive- x B Group 2 Pex Course ID: Cth Moodle X C Get HomeX C Photos Screx Interview X + ....