The reading for this module - Thomas Pogge's "Real World Injustice" -- argued that the globally affluent violate a stringent moral duty of non-harm owed to the global poor.

For writing assignment for module 10, please answer the following.

1. How does Pogge's argument differ from Singer's argument?What is the basic difference between the perspectives on global poverty offered by Pogge and Singer?
2. Which of Pogge's arguments is, in your view, the strongest?Explain this argument, its premises and conclusion, and the way in which it is strong.In your explanation be sure to illustrate the argument with an example from the real world.
3. Is the argument you have outlined (in step 2) ultimately a sound argument?Are you -- as a member of affluent world -- guilty as charged?Why or why not?