The REM representative stated, "We are tired of all this litigation, and threats of litigation. If your unreasonable complaining does not stop, we are going to sue you for failing to cooperate with us, and terminate our performance under the contract." In response, the Dean stated, "Our complaints have been reasonable and unless you retract your statement, I will view that as an anticipatory repudiation of the agreement." REM refused to retract their statement. In response, on April 23, 2020, the Dean terminated their contract. On April 30, 2020, REM sued, claiming damages. The Dean responded, "You don't have a case." In light of these facts, discuss whether REM is at fault for anticipatory repudiation or did HDLS commit the first material breach.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The question youre asking concerns a complex issue in contract law known as anticipatory repudiation Anticipatory repudiation sometimes referred to as ... View the full answer