The scoping process group is the main distinction between the Adaptive approach and the Extreme approach. This indicates that under the adaptive method, scoping is done only once at the start of the project under the presumption that the aim is well defined after requirements have been gathered and an RBS and WBS have been created (Wysocki 2014). With the Extreme method, the scoping process is carried out at each stage, presuming that the aim changes at each stage of the project life cycle. According to me, selecting a PMLC model depends on the project's goals as well as a number of other factors, including the project's overall cost, duration, market stability, technology, business environment, the number of departments it will influence, and the organisational setting. I believe that this project initially used the adaptive model because there was a problem that it would solve. However, after the project was completed, something changed that made the product's future business value uncertain it might be happened because of the further change request made by the client. As a result, the project has now changed from an adaptive to an extreme project. The problem in this instance has been solved, but the project is now seeking for a target that has business value. I would take an extraordinary approach that appears more appropriate to the circumstance within the discourse address, as the Emertxe PMLC demonstrate ought to be your favored model for any venture attempting to include trade esteem by coordination unused innovation into a current item for perform, benefit or handle (Wysocki 2014).

Critique review ?