The situation mentioned for this discussion board is a difficult situation to oversee. For the case regarding Golden Acres Farm and Ranch, the liability release was considered void due to N$.$Y$.$ Gen. Oblig. Law $5-326.$ This law states that liability releases are void if the facility is considered recreational in purpose. The only thing that I would recommend doing different is ensuring that Amy and Nate's facility is not considered a recreational facility, as this will lessen the risk of liability.

The duties that are owed to Amy's clients were, simply put, to ensure that all people and animals were kept safe. This is why it is imperative to check all equipment, property, and ensuring that client's are matched up to the appropriate horse. All client's entering Amy's facility should sign a waiver$/$liability release, as this will protect Amy and Nate, their facility, as well as the client.

How do you think Nate and Amy are better protected based on the advice given during this course so far? What more might you suggest he and Amy do$?$