Question: The Solver Sensitivity Report for some profit maximization problem with several constraints including x1
The Solver Sensitivity Report for some profit maximization problem with several constraints including x1<=400 and x2<=1200 looks like as below.
|
|
| Final | Reduced | Objective | Allowable | Allowable |
| Cell | Name | Value | Cost | Coefficient | Increase | Decrease |
| $B$16 | x1 | 400 | 80 | 80 | 1E+30 | 80 |
| $C$16 | x2 | 1200 | 129 | 129 | 1E+30 | 129 |
|
|
| Final | Shadow | Constraint | Allowable | Allowable |
| Cell | Name | Value | Price | R.H. Side | Increase | Decrease |
| $B$21 | Resource1 availability | 9200 | 0 | 10000 | 1E+30 | 800 |
| $B$22 | Resource2 availability | 2800 | 0 | 3000 | 1E+30 | 200 |
What conclusion is not correct?
Group of answer choices
For this problem, increasing the availability of resources by 1 unit will not impact the optimal value.
The value of decision variable x1 will stay at 400 unless the profit margin for x1 decreases by at least $80.
If the coefficient of x2 stays within -129 to 129+1E+30, the optimal solution does not change at all.
For this problem, decreasing the availability of resources can impact the optimal value.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
