The statute raises equal protection issues because it seems to be treating similarly situated individuals differently without a compelling state interest. The court is likely to apply the lowest level of scrutiny, the rational basis test, to determine whether the statute violates the equal protection clause.

The three levels of scrutiny that the courts use in determining whether a law violates the equal protection clause are the rational basis test, the intermediate scrutiny test, and the strict scrutiny test.

The intermediate scrutiny test would apply to this situation because the state has a compelling interest in protecting the health and safety of its citizens, and the law is designed to further that interest. The court would likely uphold the law under this test because it is not an unreasonable or arbitrary restriction on personal liberty.

Under the intermediate scrutiny test, the law is likely to be constitutional because the state has a compelling interest in protecting the health and safety of its citizens, and the law is designed to further that interest. The court is likely to uphold the law because it is not an unreasonable or arbitrary restriction on personal liberty. Final answer: $1.$ The statute raises equal protection issues because it seems to be treating similarly situated individuals differently without a compelling state interest.

The three levels of scrutiny that the courts use in determining whether a law violates the equal protection clause are the rational basis test, the intermediate scrutiny test, and the strict scrutiny test.

The intermediate scrutiny test would apply to this situation because the state has a compelling interest in protecting the health and safety of its citizens, and the law is designed to further that interest.

Under the intermediate scrutiny test, the law is likely to be constitutional because the state has a compelling interest in protecting the health and safety of its citizens, and the law is designed to further that interest. The court is likely to uphold the law because it is not an unreasonable or arbitrary restriction on personal liberty.