The term discrimination is not given a single definition in the BC human rights code. So how is its meaning addressed by the courts then?

A) The courts have initially interpreted discrimination to mean an intentional act of exclusion

B) There is no objective test to establish discrimination, therefore, the courts are reluctant to define its meaning

C) The courts interpretation is based on a purely subjective interpretation of the facts in any given case

D) If the courts are able to establish a prima facie case of discrimination based on the facts, then the onus is on the complainant to prove the employers conduct is not justified

E) The courts have refrained from defining discrimination but rather allow organizations to define it themselves

What is an example of a circumstance where an employer is justified in asking questions that appear to be discriminatory?

A) Where there is reasonable grounds for undue hardship

B) There is no circumstance where an employer is justified in asking discriminatory questions

C) Where the employment is exempt from an employment equity program

D) Where there is a bona fide occupational requirement

E) Where the employee is justified in ensuring the success of the organization

According to the textbook, discrimination in employment is prohibited on numerous grounds in B.C; these grounds include:

A) Political Belief, source of income, sex, age, and ancestry

B) Race, religion, sex, age, and political belief

C) Sex, age ancestry, religion, and source of income

D) Gender identity, sex, religion, age, and source of income

E) Source of income, race, religion, age and incestry