Question: The theorem from question 1 . ( e ) provides an upper bound on the number of steps of the Perceptron algorithm and implies that
The theorem from question e provides an upper bound on the number of steps of the Perceptron algorithm and implies that it indeed converges. In this question, we will show that the result still holds even when e is not initialized to In other words: Given a set of training examples that are linearly separable through the origin, show that the initialization of does not impact the perceptron algorithm's ability to eventually converge. To derive the bounds for convergence, we assume the following inequalities holds: There exists such that y y for all i n and some All the examples are bounded R i n If @ is initialized to we can show by induction that: old A ky For instance, ggx yxk If we initialize to a general not necessarily then: ol zatky o Determine the formulation of a in terms of and ; Important: Please enter as theta" star and as theta" to and use norn for the vector norm
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
