The value difference between Klaus's worsened behavior at the end of the $12$ weeks versus the promise to $$cure$$ Klaus of ADHD can be described as a measure, in part, of:

punitive damages.

compensatory damages.

restitution.

All of these are correct.

Assessment question

Which of the following would Natasha argue to be an appropriate remedy in this case?

Injunction.

Compensatory and$/$or punitive damages.

Specific performance.

Reformation.

Assessment question

If the court finds that no valid contract existed between BrainTrain and Natasha because of a failure in the meeting of the minds, what could Natasha argue to still recover damages?

She is not able to recover damages if there is no contract.

Expectation damages.

Liquidated damages.

Restitution.

Assessment question

If BrainTrain and Natasha had executed a written contract which contained a liquidated damages clause for $$200$ in the event that BrainTrain breached, and assuming BrainTrain admits to a breach, would that clause be upheld in court?

No$,$ in this case, actual damages can be easily determined.

Yes, it is reasonable and fair.

No$,$ the amount is too low for the type of harm she suffered.

Yes, it was mutually agreed upon by both parties.

Assessment question

In this case, what $($if anything$)$ could Natasha have done to mitigate her monetary damages after paying for the program?

She could have insisted more strongly on a refund.

She could have taken Klaus to another program.

Nothing.

She could have continued to seek the right medication for Klaus.