The ViPR would enable software-defined centers by features, such as (i) It would allow the multi-vendor block and file storage environments a storage automation capabilities; (ii) I would require only sing sing-on data access for multiple data centres, which are in different locations; (iii) It would provide data centers data replication to protect against failures of data center; (iv) Via ViPR Block Service (data path) ViPR would allow scalable, dynamic, commodity-based block storage; (v) ViPR would integrate with Microsoft compute stacks and VMware to allow high level of compute and network orchestration. To provide maximum flexibility to a user, the ViPR has management interfaces, such as API (Application Programming Interface), CLI (Command Line Interface) and UI (a web-based User Interface). Furthermore, the storage systems supported by ViPR include EMC VPLEX, EMC VNX, EMC Symmetric VMAX, NetApp, Isilon and Hitachi Unified Storage VM. The ViPR services include: (i) Object Service: It would allow you to store, access and manipulate unstructured data as objects on storage systems, which are file-based, i.e., EMC, VNX, etc., And it would not rewrite the existing file-based applications; (ii) HDFS Service: ViPR provides a support for Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) that would allow the existing file-based storage to be leveraged in order to build scalable, robust data processing environments, which are based on Hadoop framework. What is your observation on above analysis, Is ViPR better than VMware?