The waterfall or traditional software methodology is considered by many to have exceeded its useful life and is inappropriate for modern development projects.$$ Surveys, however, show that the method is still widely used in many organizations. Which of the following reasons explains why it is still considered a viable methodology in$$ today's fast$-$paced development$$ environment?

Question content area bottom

Part $1$

A$.$

It has a strong track record of delivering quality software on time.

B$.$

Organizations need time to adjust to its$$ team$-$oriented approach.

C$.$

It adapts quickly to inevitable changes in a project.

D$.$

It is more iterative and allows developers to rapidly build workable components.

E$.$

It has a logical and familiar$$ structure, which is comfortable to use.