The "You Should Know!" box titled "Proof and Truth" suggests that adversarial proceedings can be distinguished as relying more on the government's ability to prove the defendant's guilt whereas the inquisitorial process spends more time on investigations to determine the defendant truly committed the crime. Do you think that is a fair distinction? Include in your response references to the additional identifiers noted in the box (e.g., legal guilt versus factual guilt and due process versus crime control).

Comparative Criminal Justice Systems by Philip Reichel, 7th Edition