Theranos case analysis and not a summary!!

. Make a specific recommendation based on your analysis of the case, on the important facts that youve identified in Question 2 and support it with the ethical model (moral theory) that you have considered most relevant in your analysis.

A) Be sure to state how your recommendation is tied to your analysis and facts and how it is supported by a relevant ethical model.

B) Name any specific professional code(s) of ethics that might be applicable to the entities in this case and state how the code(s) would support your recommendation. Conduct research to find current day codes of ethics that are applicable. Be sure that this is a professional code, not an industry code or regulatory standard.

Your recommendation should be one of the three alternatives that you have proposed. Use supporting data (e.g., important facts of case, analysis of alternatives, support offered by specific code(s) of professional ethics, key concepts studied in the course, and ethical model) to argue why your recommendation is the best alternative.

Merely stating your opinion without supporting data (e.g., important facts of case, analysis of alternatives, support offered by specific code(s) of professional ethics, key concepts studied in the course, and ethical model) is not a recommendation.

Does your recommendation provide a reasoned solution to the issue(s) you identified which is fraud