There are three sections $($Acts$)$ to this case. In the case, question$($s$)$ are listed after each Act. Do NOT answer

those questions. Instead, answer the following questions:

$1.$ What global staffing model has Pharmaz adopted?

$2.$ What are the potential problems with this approach, if any, AND how do you see these playing out at

Pharmaz?

$3.$ What cultural values do you see as most relevant for understanding interactions between Niels and

Amrita and their differing management styles?

$4.$ Toward the end of the case, Amrita implements her suggestions for transferring Pharmaz$$s corporate

values$/$culture to Pharmaz India. How effective do you think her suggestions can be for achieving this

goal and altering employees$$ attitudes and behaviors? Provide sound reasoning for your answer

$5.$ There are plans for significant growth at Pharmaz India. Going forward, what recommendations would

you make to Pharmaz with respect to global staffing AND selecting expatriates for Pharmaz India and

the company$$s other foreign subsidiaries?

For all questions, be specific and reference appropriate case material and course material to support your

answer$($s$).$

Resources to be used in analyzing the case:

$1.$ Milestone $1($Cultural values$)$ material.

$2.$ Milestone $2($Global Staffing and Expatriate Selection and Training$)$ material.

$3.$ Cultural Intelligence material.

Grading Guidelines and Rubric:

You should submit your team$$s responses as a word document in Canvas Assignments. Page number your

document and use $12-$point font with one inch margins. Only one team member should submit it$.$

It is important that you clearly number your responses $($e$.$g$.,$ there should be $5)$ and clearly delineate questions

being answered. Do NOT submit one long document that does not include numbered responses. NO

exceptions. Carefully review the grading template below and in the Canvas assignment before submitting this

assignment. There are no Redo$$s once an assignment has been graded.

Writing style, quality of content, font, spacing, etc. should be the same throughout the paper. The document

should read as a cohesive whole as opposed to a patchwork of different team member contributions. I should

not be able to detect that different people contributed to the final product.

Your analysis should be well$-$organized, with meaningful, non$-$superficial responses, in which relevant course

content is appropriately applied in answering case questions. It must be clear to me that you fully understand