There is ONE (1) Article in this section. Answer all questions in the Answer booklet. Johnson \& Johnson to replace talc-based powder with Corn starch. Rv Pretar Hotkine Johnson \& Johnson (JEJ) will stop making and selling its talc-based baby powder around the world from next year. The annoancement comes more than two years after the healabcare giant ended sales of the prodact in the US. The move could be a strategic decision as JSEJ faces tens of thousands of lawsuits from women who allege its talcum powder contained asbestos and caused them to develop ovarian cancer. But the company reiterated its view that decades of independent research show the prodoct is safe to use. "As part of a worldwide portfolio assessmeat, we have made the commercial decision to transition to an all-com starch-based baby powder pertfolio," it said in a statement. The fim added that corn-starcb-based buby powder is already sold in countries around the world. At the same time J\&.J reiterated its position that its baby powder is safe to use: "Our position on the safety of oar cosmetic talc remains unchanged." "We stand firmly behind the decades of independent scientific analysis by medical experts around the world that confirms talc-based Jobhsca's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer," it said. In 2020, J J.J said it would stop selling its talc baby powder in the US and Canada because demand had fallen in the wake of what it called "misinformation" about the product's safety amid a number of legal cases, At the time the firm said it would continue to sell its tale-based baby powder in the UK and the rest of the world. The company faces lawsaits from consamers and their sarvivors who claim MEJ's talc products caused cancer due to contamination with asbestos. Talc is mined from the earth and is found in seams close to that of asbestos, which is a material known to cause cancer. A 2018 investigation by the Reuters news agency claimed that J\&J knew for decades that asbestos was present in its tale products. Reuters said that iaternal company records, trial testimouy and other evidence showed that from at least 1971 to the early 20005 , J\&J's raw talc and finished ponders sometimes tested positive for small amounts of asbestos. In response to evideace of asbetios confamination presented in court rootns, media reports and to US lawmakers, the firm has repeatedly denied the allegations. fi October, JS.J created a subsidiary. L. TI. Management, assigning its talc claims to it. If later placed it into bankruptcy, which pansed the pending lawsuits. Before the bankruptey filing. the company faced costs from $3.5ba (E2.87bo) in verdicts and sertlements. including one in which 22 women were awatded a jodgement of more than $2b0. In ApriL a sharebolder proposal calling for an end to global sales of the tale baby powder failed. Johnsoa's Baby Powder has been sold for almost 130 years and became a symbol of the company's family-friendly image. Baby powder is used for preventing aappy rash and for cosmetic uses. including as a dry shampoo. Source: https: www. bbe cominews hasiness - 62514263 4. According to the article, "In 2020,J&J said it would stop selling its talc baby powder in the US and Canada because demand had fallen in the wake of what it called "misinformation" about the product's safety amid a number of legal cases. At the time the firm said it would continue to sell its talc-based baby powder in the UK and the rest of the world. Explain from the perspective of 'Utilitarianism' and 'Rights and Duties', whether the Johnson and Johnson business operation decision to continue the sales of talc-based baby powder to another region is morally right or wrong. ( 8 Marks)